Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
HC dismissed the writ petition while directing PWD authorities to refund Rs. 65.28 lakhs of GST to appellant's cash/credit ledger and pay Rs. 84,84,035/- towards service tax within a stipulated timeframe. The appellant must remit the service tax amount to authorities within three days of receipt. The court set aside penalties imposed under Sections 78 of Finance Act, Section 174 of CGST Act, and Sections 77(1)(a) and 77(2) of Finance Act, finding no justification for penalty imposition. The order upheld the principle of exhausting statutory appellate remedies and recognized administrative complexities in the transaction, ultimately allowing the appeal with specific monetary and procedural directions.
HC dismissed the writ petition while directing PWD authorities to refund Rs. 65.28 lakhs of GST to appellant's cash/credit ledger and pay Rs. 84,84,035/- towards service tax within a stipulated timeframe. The appellant must remit the service tax amount to authorities within three days of receipt. The court set aside penalties imposed under Sections 78 of Finance Act, Section 174 of CGST Act, and Sections 77(1)(a) and 77(2) of Finance Act, finding no justification for penalty imposition. The order upheld the principle of exhausting statutory appellate remedies and recognized administrative complexities in the transaction, ultimately allowing the appeal with specific monetary and procedural directions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4786
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
