Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
HC affirmed ITAT's order regarding service of notice through electronic portal. The court held that uploading notice on ITBA portal without explicit consent or actual email communication does not constitute valid legal service. Following precedential principles, the court determined that electronic service via e-portal without direct recipient confirmation fails to meet procedural requirements under Section 282 of Income Tax Act and Rule 127 of Income Tax Rules. Consequently, ex-parte dismissal of appellant's appeal was deemed improper, with HC setting aside lower appellate authorities' orders as illegal and directing reconsideration of the original appeal on merits.
HC affirmed ITAT's order regarding service of notice through electronic portal. The court held that uploading notice on ITBA portal without explicit consent or actual email communication does not constitute valid legal service. Following precedential principles, the court determined that electronic service via e-portal without direct recipient confirmation fails to meet procedural requirements under Section 282 of Income Tax Act and Rule 127 of Income Tax Rules. Consequently, ex-parte dismissal of appellant's appeal was deemed improper, with HC setting aside lower appellate authorities' orders as illegal and directing reconsideration of the original appeal on merits.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.