Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
HC affirmed ITAT's order regarding service of notice through electronic portal. The court held that uploading notice on ITBA portal without explicit consent or actual email communication does not constitute valid legal service. Following precedential principles, the court determined that electronic service via e-portal without direct recipient confirmation fails to meet procedural requirements under Section 282 of Income Tax Act and Rule 127 of Income Tax Rules. Consequently, ex-parte dismissal of appellant's appeal was deemed improper, with HC setting aside lower appellate authorities' orders as illegal and directing reconsideration of the original appeal on merits.
HC affirmed ITAT's order regarding service of notice through electronic portal. The court held that uploading notice on ITBA portal without explicit consent or actual email communication does not constitute valid legal service. Following precedential principles, the court determined that electronic service via e-portal without direct recipient confirmation fails to meet procedural requirements under Section 282 of Income Tax Act and Rule 127 of Income Tax Rules. Consequently, ex-parte dismissal of appellant's appeal was deemed improper, with HC setting aside lower appellate authorities' orders as illegal and directing reconsideration of the original appeal on merits.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.