Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
HC held that the tax authority's reopening of assessment against the mutual fund was invalid. The notice contained discrepancies between alleged fund manipulation and actual transaction details. Relying on precedent in a similar case involving JM Financial, the court found no substantive basis for reassessment. The jurisdictional defect in the reopening process rendered the Section 148A notice and subsequent order unsustainable. Consequently, the impugned notice and order were quashed, effectively allowing the assessee's appeal and nullifying the attempted reassessment.
HC held that the tax authority's reopening of assessment against the mutual fund was invalid. The notice contained discrepancies between alleged fund manipulation and actual transaction details. Relying on precedent in a similar case involving JM Financial, the court found no substantive basis for reassessment. The jurisdictional defect in the reopening process rendered the Section 148A notice and subsequent order unsustainable. Consequently, the impugned notice and order were quashed, effectively allowing the assessee's appeal and nullifying the attempted reassessment.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4814 
Join Channel 
