Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3221 to 3240 of 96177 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC held that under Section 194A of Income Tax Act, 1961, the tax deductor was not liable for immediate penalty when TDS was not deducted from interest/finance charges paid to NBFCs. The AO must first provide an opportunity to the appellant to establish that the tax deductee has paid applicable taxes. The lower appellate authorities' orders were set aside, and the matter was remanded to the AO for fresh consideration, requiring a fair hearing to the appellant and verification of whether the NBFCs incorporated the receipts in their accounts and paid corresponding taxes.
HC held that under Section 194A of Income Tax Act, 1961, the tax deductor was not liable for immediate penalty when TDS was not deducted from interest/finance charges paid to NBFCs. The AO must first provide an opportunity to the appellant to establish that the tax deductee has paid applicable taxes. The lower appellate authorities' orders were set aside, and the matter was remanded to the AO for fresh consideration, requiring a fair hearing to the appellant and verification of whether the NBFCs incorporated the receipts in their accounts and paid corresponding taxes.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
