Arrest safeguards and transit remand requirements invalidated detention following inter-State transfer without communicated grounds or magistrate auth...
Arrest safeguards require disclosed grounds, relative intimation and transit remand, while duplicate prosecution under the CGST framework is unsustain...
Document Identification Number defects can invalidate GST assessments, with delayed challenges entertained conditionally where patent irregularities e...
Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Business expenditure substantiation supports scrap credits, statutory payments and expense claims, while depreciation requires proof of actual busines...
Page of 4794
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
621 to 640 of 95875 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC dismissed the writ petition challenging a penalty order under Section 271D of the Income Tax Act. The court held that the limitation period for passing the penalty order was extended till 31.03.2022 through Notification No.113/2021, rendering the order dated 19.08.2021 within valid jurisdiction. The petitioner's arguments regarding premature order and awaiting appellate commissioner's decision were rejected. The court granted liberty to the petitioner to file an appeal before the Appellate Commissioner under Section 246A within 30 days of receiving the order's copy, effectively upholding the penalty order's validity.
HC dismissed the writ petition challenging a penalty order under Section 271D of the Income Tax Act. The court held that the limitation period for passing the penalty order was extended till 31.03.2022 through Notification No.113/2021, rendering the order dated 19.08.2021 within valid jurisdiction. The petitioner's arguments regarding premature order and awaiting appellate commissioner's decision were rejected. The court granted liberty to the petitioner to file an appeal before the Appellate Commissioner under Section 246A within 30 days of receiving the order's copy, effectively upholding the penalty order's validity.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4794
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
