Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
HC dismissed the writ petition challenging a penalty order under Section 271D of the Income Tax Act. The court held that the limitation period for passing the penalty order was extended till 31.03.2022 through Notification No.113/2021, rendering the order dated 19.08.2021 within valid jurisdiction. The petitioner's arguments regarding premature order and awaiting appellate commissioner's decision were rejected. The court granted liberty to the petitioner to file an appeal before the Appellate Commissioner under Section 246A within 30 days of receiving the order's copy, effectively upholding the penalty order's validity.
HC dismissed the writ petition challenging a penalty order under Section 271D of the Income Tax Act. The court held that the limitation period for passing the penalty order was extended till 31.03.2022 through Notification No.113/2021, rendering the order dated 19.08.2021 within valid jurisdiction. The petitioner's arguments regarding premature order and awaiting appellate commissioner's decision were rejected. The court granted liberty to the petitioner to file an appeal before the Appellate Commissioner under Section 246A within 30 days of receiving the order's copy, effectively upholding the penalty order's validity.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
