Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
HC dismissed the writ petition challenging a penalty order under Section 271D of the Income Tax Act. The court held that the limitation period for passing the penalty order was extended till 31.03.2022 through Notification No.113/2021, rendering the order dated 19.08.2021 within valid jurisdiction. The petitioner's arguments regarding premature order and awaiting appellate commissioner's decision were rejected. The court granted liberty to the petitioner to file an appeal before the Appellate Commissioner under Section 246A within 30 days of receiving the order's copy, effectively upholding the penalty order's validity.
HC dismissed the writ petition challenging a penalty order under Section 271D of the Income Tax Act. The court held that the limitation period for passing the penalty order was extended till 31.03.2022 through Notification No.113/2021, rendering the order dated 19.08.2021 within valid jurisdiction. The petitioner's arguments regarding premature order and awaiting appellate commissioner's decision were rejected. The court granted liberty to the petitioner to file an appeal before the Appellate Commissioner under Section 246A within 30 days of receiving the order's copy, effectively upholding the penalty order's validity.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4790
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
