Certificate-of-origin verification procedure governs preferential customs benefits; denial without retroactive verification was set aside with consequ...
Disciplinary Committee jurisdiction and mandatory investigation requirements invalidated cancellation of an insolvency professional's registration and...
Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
HC held that additions to income under block assessment can be made based on statements recorded u/s 132(4) and seized materials. The appellant's argument attributing income to deceased father was rejected due to lack of supporting evidence. The court found the statement reliable as the appellant did not retract it and failed to respond to notice u/s 158BC. Seized materials and assessee's own statement substantiated the income additions. Relying on precedent, the court affirmed that where inferences about undisclosed income are strong and based on search materials and statements, such additions are permissible. The order was ultimately decided in favor of the revenue.
HC held that additions to income under block assessment can be made based on statements recorded u/s 132(4) and seized materials. The appellant's argument attributing income to deceased father was rejected due to lack of supporting evidence. The court found the statement reliable as the appellant did not retract it and failed to respond to notice u/s 158BC. Seized materials and assessee's own statement substantiated the income additions. Relying on precedent, the court affirmed that where inferences about undisclosed income are strong and based on search materials and statements, such additions are permissible. The order was ultimately decided in favor of the revenue.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
