Charitable trust income application permits verified capital expenditure but rejects deferred pre-operative claims and requires reconsideration of con...
Reinsurance premium deductions require established regulatory breaches, while independently acquired software qualifies within the computer depreciati...
Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Page of 4801
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
861 to 880 of 96001 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC held that additions to income under block assessment can be made based on statements recorded u/s 132(4) and seized materials. The appellant's argument attributing income to deceased father was rejected due to lack of supporting evidence. The court found the statement reliable as the appellant did not retract it and failed to respond to notice u/s 158BC. Seized materials and assessee's own statement substantiated the income additions. Relying on precedent, the court affirmed that where inferences about undisclosed income are strong and based on search materials and statements, such additions are permissible. The order was ultimately decided in favor of the revenue.
HC held that additions to income under block assessment can be made based on statements recorded u/s 132(4) and seized materials. The appellant's argument attributing income to deceased father was rejected due to lack of supporting evidence. The court found the statement reliable as the appellant did not retract it and failed to respond to notice u/s 158BC. Seized materials and assessee's own statement substantiated the income additions. Relying on precedent, the court affirmed that where inferences about undisclosed income are strong and based on search materials and statements, such additions are permissible. The order was ultimately decided in favor of the revenue.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.