Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
HC held that additions to income under block assessment can be made based on statements recorded u/s 132(4) and seized materials. The appellant's argument attributing income to deceased father was rejected due to lack of supporting evidence. The court found the statement reliable as the appellant did not retract it and failed to respond to notice u/s 158BC. Seized materials and assessee's own statement substantiated the income additions. Relying on precedent, the court affirmed that where inferences about undisclosed income are strong and based on search materials and statements, such additions are permissible. The order was ultimately decided in favor of the revenue.
HC held that additions to income under block assessment can be made based on statements recorded u/s 132(4) and seized materials. The appellant's argument attributing income to deceased father was rejected due to lack of supporting evidence. The court found the statement reliable as the appellant did not retract it and failed to respond to notice u/s 158BC. Seized materials and assessee's own statement substantiated the income additions. Relying on precedent, the court affirmed that where inferences about undisclosed income are strong and based on search materials and statements, such additions are permissible. The order was ultimately decided in favor of the revenue.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.