Necessary-party requirements limit impleadment of independent entities, while deferred consideration does not create an appealable adverse determinati...
Food supplement classification requires common parlance and authoritative tests, preventing treatment as proprietary Ayurvedic medicines without suppo...
Specified regulatory authority income receives conditional tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income character, and return f...
Tax exemption for regulatory authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-filing...
Input tax credit conditions remain constitutionally valid, with eligible recipient claims considered under GST circulars and retrospective filing dead...
Page of 4790
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
481 to 500 of 95794 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
CESTAT analyzed the classification of yoga services for service tax purposes. The Tribunal held that yoga and meditation services fall under 'health and fitness service' for the period October 2008 to June 2012, rendering them taxable. Training courses like TTC, ATTC, and Vastu Shastra were classified as 'Commercial Training or Coaching Centre Service'. For the period July 2012 to October 2015, services provided by the charitable trust were exempted under the Negative List regime. The extended period of limitation was upheld. The appeal was partially disposed of, with directions to compute the exact tax liability, interest, and penalties after excluding unrelated receipts.
CESTAT analyzed the classification of yoga services for service tax purposes. The Tribunal held that yoga and meditation services fall under 'health and fitness service' for the period October 2008 to June 2012, rendering them taxable. Training courses like TTC, ATTC, and Vastu Shastra were classified as 'Commercial Training or Coaching Centre Service'. For the period July 2012 to October 2015, services provided by the charitable trust were exempted under the Negative List regime. The extended period of limitation was upheld. The appeal was partially disposed of, with directions to compute the exact tax liability, interest, and penalties after excluding unrelated receipts.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.