Condonation of refiling delay refused where repeated defects, lack of diligence and vague explanations defeated the appeal against resolution plan app...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
4401 to 4420 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC adjudicated constitutional challenge to Section 16(2)(c) of CGST Act, determining procedural validity regarding time limitation. The court directed the Appellate Authority to consider the petitioner's time spent before the court as bona fide and condone delay in appeal filing. The impugned Order-in-Appeal was quashed and set aside, with the matter remanded to the Appellate Authority for merit-based evaluation. The court explicitly instructed that the appeal shall not be rejected solely on grounds of procedural delay, effectively providing equitable relief to the petitioner and ensuring substantive hearing of the underlying dispute.
HC adjudicated constitutional challenge to Section 16(2)(c) of CGST Act, determining procedural validity regarding time limitation. The court directed the Appellate Authority to consider the petitioner's time spent before the court as bona fide and condone delay in appeal filing. The impugned Order-in-Appeal was quashed and set aside, with the matter remanded to the Appellate Authority for merit-based evaluation. The court explicitly instructed that the appeal shall not be rejected solely on grounds of procedural delay, effectively providing equitable relief to the petitioner and ensuring substantive hearing of the underlying dispute.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
