Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Page of 4794
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
21 to 40 of 95872 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT determined the tax treatment of a property sale, characterizing it as a short-term capital gain under section 50. The tribunal held that the property remained a business asset despite inconsistent depreciation claims, with its written down value as of 31.03.2003 (Rs. 33,02,106) to be reduced from the sale consideration (Rs. 1,45,00,000). Although classified as a short-term capital gain, the asset retains its long-term capital asset status, with tax rates applied under section 112. The tribunal allowed set-off of brought-forward long-term capital loss against the short-term capital gain, ultimately dismissing the assessee's primary contention.
ITAT determined the tax treatment of a property sale, characterizing it as a short-term capital gain under section 50. The tribunal held that the property remained a business asset despite inconsistent depreciation claims, with its written down value as of 31.03.2003 (Rs. 33,02,106) to be reduced from the sale consideration (Rs. 1,45,00,000). Although classified as a short-term capital gain, the asset retains its long-term capital asset status, with tax rates applied under section 112. The tribunal allowed set-off of brought-forward long-term capital loss against the short-term capital gain, ultimately dismissing the assessee's primary contention.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.