Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Page of 4794
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1 to 20 of 95872 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT determined the tax treatment of a property sale, characterizing it as a short-term capital gain under section 50. The tribunal held that the property remained a business asset despite inconsistent depreciation claims, with its written down value as of 31.03.2003 (Rs. 33,02,106) to be reduced from the sale consideration (Rs. 1,45,00,000). Although classified as a short-term capital gain, the asset retains its long-term capital asset status, with tax rates applied under section 112. The tribunal allowed set-off of brought-forward long-term capital loss against the short-term capital gain, ultimately dismissing the assessee's primary contention.
ITAT determined the tax treatment of a property sale, characterizing it as a short-term capital gain under section 50. The tribunal held that the property remained a business asset despite inconsistent depreciation claims, with its written down value as of 31.03.2003 (Rs. 33,02,106) to be reduced from the sale consideration (Rs. 1,45,00,000). Although classified as a short-term capital gain, the asset retains its long-term capital asset status, with tax rates applied under section 112. The tribunal allowed set-off of brought-forward long-term capital loss against the short-term capital gain, ultimately dismissing the assessee's primary contention.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.