Certificate-of-origin verification procedure governs preferential customs benefits; denial without retroactive verification was set aside with consequ...
Disciplinary Committee jurisdiction and mandatory investigation requirements invalidated cancellation of an insolvency professional's registration and...
Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
The AT adjudicated a challenge to a provisional attachment order involving financial institutions and defaulting entities. Following the NCLT's approval of a Resolution Plan for one company and liquidation of another, the Tribunal held that financial institutions cannot claim release of mortgaged properties beyond amounts settled in the Resolution Plan. The Tribunal lacked jurisdiction to resolve inter-se disputes between parties and directed financial institutions to pursue appropriate remedies under applicable statutes. The appeals were disposed of, granting liberty to seek recourse through suitable legal mechanisms, with explicit reference to Section 32A of IBC and Section 8(7) of the Act of 2002.
The AT adjudicated a challenge to a provisional attachment order involving financial institutions and defaulting entities. Following the NCLT's approval of a Resolution Plan for one company and liquidation of another, the Tribunal held that financial institutions cannot claim release of mortgaged properties beyond amounts settled in the Resolution Plan. The Tribunal lacked jurisdiction to resolve inter-se disputes between parties and directed financial institutions to pursue appropriate remedies under applicable statutes. The appeals were disposed of, granting liberty to seek recourse through suitable legal mechanisms, with explicit reference to Section 32A of IBC and Section 8(7) of the Act of 2002.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.