Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
The AT adjudicated a challenge to a provisional attachment order involving financial institutions and defaulting entities. Following the NCLT's approval of a Resolution Plan for one company and liquidation of another, the Tribunal held that financial institutions cannot claim release of mortgaged properties beyond amounts settled in the Resolution Plan. The Tribunal lacked jurisdiction to resolve inter-se disputes between parties and directed financial institutions to pursue appropriate remedies under applicable statutes. The appeals were disposed of, granting liberty to seek recourse through suitable legal mechanisms, with explicit reference to Section 32A of IBC and Section 8(7) of the Act of 2002.
The AT adjudicated a challenge to a provisional attachment order involving financial institutions and defaulting entities. Following the NCLT's approval of a Resolution Plan for one company and liquidation of another, the Tribunal held that financial institutions cannot claim release of mortgaged properties beyond amounts settled in the Resolution Plan. The Tribunal lacked jurisdiction to resolve inter-se disputes between parties and directed financial institutions to pursue appropriate remedies under applicable statutes. The appeals were disposed of, granting liberty to seek recourse through suitable legal mechanisms, with explicit reference to Section 32A of IBC and Section 8(7) of the Act of 2002.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.