Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
221 to 240 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The AT adjudicated a challenge to a provisional attachment order involving financial institutions and defaulting entities. Following the NCLT's approval of a Resolution Plan for one company and liquidation of another, the Tribunal held that financial institutions cannot claim release of mortgaged properties beyond amounts settled in the Resolution Plan. The Tribunal lacked jurisdiction to resolve inter-se disputes between parties and directed financial institutions to pursue appropriate remedies under applicable statutes. The appeals were disposed of, granting liberty to seek recourse through suitable legal mechanisms, with explicit reference to Section 32A of IBC and Section 8(7) of the Act of 2002.
The AT adjudicated a challenge to a provisional attachment order involving financial institutions and defaulting entities. Following the NCLT's approval of a Resolution Plan for one company and liquidation of another, the Tribunal held that financial institutions cannot claim release of mortgaged properties beyond amounts settled in the Resolution Plan. The Tribunal lacked jurisdiction to resolve inter-se disputes between parties and directed financial institutions to pursue appropriate remedies under applicable statutes. The appeals were disposed of, granting liberty to seek recourse through suitable legal mechanisms, with explicit reference to Section 32A of IBC and Section 8(7) of the Act of 2002.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.