Prospective valuation amendment limits reassessment: unamended fair market value reference could not justify reopening based on a registered valuer's ...
Exemption for examination-related services rejected where recipients were commercial entities; suppression sustained extended limitation and penalties...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1501 to 1520 of 96177 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC declined to entertain the petition challenging the Tribunal's decision under Section 254(2) regarding TP adjustment for guarantee fees paid to an Associated Enterprise. The Court noted that the Tribunal had decided Ground No.4 in favor of the Assessee based on a precedent from the Gujarat HC [2018] that confirmed a similar ruling for an earlier assessment year (2009-10). The Court determined it would be an academic exercise to evaluate the Tribunal's power to recall its order under Section 254(2) when the HC had already approved similar findings in the previous assessment year, thereby implicitly validating the Tribunal's conclusion rejecting the upward TP adjustment of guarantee fees.
The HC declined to entertain the petition challenging the Tribunal's decision under Section 254(2) regarding TP adjustment for guarantee fees paid to an Associated Enterprise. The Court noted that the Tribunal had decided Ground No.4 in favor of the Assessee based on a precedent from the Gujarat HC [2018] that confirmed a similar ruling for an earlier assessment year (2009-10). The Court determined it would be an academic exercise to evaluate the Tribunal's power to recall its order under Section 254(2) when the HC had already approved similar findings in the previous assessment year, thereby implicitly validating the Tribunal's conclusion rejecting the upward TP adjustment of guarantee fees.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
