Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT set aside a penalty of Rs. 15 lakhs imposed under section 271D for alleged violation of section 269SS. The Tribunal found that the loan amount was disbursed through banking channels and duly confirmed by both the NBFC and the concerned party. The ITAT held that section 269SS applies only to actual acceptance of money and not to liabilities recorded through journal entries, as the legislative intent is to prevent cash transactions. The provision is restricted to monetary transactions and does not extend to cases where debt or liability arises merely through book entries. Following precedents from the Bombay HC, Delhi HC, and other judicial authorities, the Tribunal concluded the transaction was outside the ambit of section 269SS and deleted the penalty.
The ITAT set aside a penalty of Rs. 15 lakhs imposed under section 271D for alleged violation of section 269SS. The Tribunal found that the loan amount was disbursed through banking channels and duly confirmed by both the NBFC and the concerned party. The ITAT held that section 269SS applies only to actual acceptance of money and not to liabilities recorded through journal entries, as the legislative intent is to prevent cash transactions. The provision is restricted to monetary transactions and does not extend to cases where debt or liability arises merely through book entries. Following precedents from the Bombay HC, Delhi HC, and other judicial authorities, the Tribunal concluded the transaction was outside the ambit of section 269SS and deleted the penalty.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.