Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The ITAT dismissed Revenue's appeal regarding addition for under-valuation of closing work-in-progress. Following precedent from a Coordinate Bench, the Tribunal held that SS145A requires inventory valuation at lower of actual cost or net realizable value, and excise duty should not be included in closing WIP as no such amount was paid since the stage of levy had not arisen. Regarding disallowance under SS43B for bonus/ex-gratia payments, ITAT upheld CIT(A)'s direction to AO to verify whether payments were made before the filing deadline (30/11/2018), characterizing this as limited verification rather than remand. The Tribunal confirmed that SS43B emphasizes actual payment before the return filing date with proper evidence furnished by the assessee.
The ITAT dismissed Revenue's appeal regarding addition for under-valuation of closing work-in-progress. Following precedent from a Coordinate Bench, the Tribunal held that SS145A requires inventory valuation at lower of actual cost or net realizable value, and excise duty should not be included in closing WIP as no such amount was paid since the stage of levy had not arisen. Regarding disallowance under SS43B for bonus/ex-gratia payments, ITAT upheld CIT(A)'s direction to AO to verify whether payments were made before the filing deadline (30/11/2018), characterizing this as limited verification rather than remand. The Tribunal confirmed that SS43B emphasizes actual payment before the return filing date with proper evidence furnished by the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.