Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The SC clarified that applications for fraudulent and wrongful trading under Section 66 of IBC are distinct from avoidance applications under Sections 43, 45, and 50. The Court upheld NCLT's approval of the Resolution Plan, ruling that NCLAT had improperly interfered with the Committee of Creditors' commercial wisdom regarding recoveries from fraudulent transactions. The Court emphasized that judicial review of resolution plans is limited to compliance with Section 30(2) requirements, with commercial decisions left to the CoC's discretion. The SC further determined that the resolution plan did not violate RBI or NHB Acts, as neither statute mandates full payment of deposits. The NCLT was directed to separately adjudicate avoidance applications and Section 66 applications.
The SC clarified that applications for fraudulent and wrongful trading under Section 66 of IBC are distinct from avoidance applications under Sections 43, 45, and 50. The Court upheld NCLT's approval of the Resolution Plan, ruling that NCLAT had improperly interfered with the Committee of Creditors' commercial wisdom regarding recoveries from fraudulent transactions. The Court emphasized that judicial review of resolution plans is limited to compliance with Section 30(2) requirements, with commercial decisions left to the CoC's discretion. The SC further determined that the resolution plan did not violate RBI or NHB Acts, as neither statute mandates full payment of deposits. The NCLT was directed to separately adjudicate avoidance applications and Section 66 applications.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
