Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The HC dismissed appellants' application for de-freezing bank accounts, clarifying that no debit freeze exists according to the Enforcement Directorate (ED). The Court ruled that appellants are free to operate their accounts in accordance with law. ED was directed to communicate this position to the respective banks within five working days, including a copy of the order to lift any debit freeze. However, the Court specified that appeals challenging the attachment orders filed before the Tribunal shall be decided on their own merits. The appeal was accordingly disposed of.
The HC dismissed appellants' application for de-freezing bank accounts, clarifying that no debit freeze exists according to the Enforcement Directorate (ED). The Court ruled that appellants are free to operate their accounts in accordance with law. ED was directed to communicate this position to the respective banks within five working days, including a copy of the order to lift any debit freeze. However, the Court specified that appeals challenging the attachment orders filed before the Tribunal shall be decided on their own merits. The appeal was accordingly disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.