Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
The Appellate Tribunal allowed the assessee's claim for tax exemption under section 54 of the Income Tax Act, despite initially claiming under section 54F. The dispute concerned a property registered as residential but commercially leased to a bank since 2009. ITAT noted that both sections have similar conditions, with section 54F requiring investment of net consideration rather than just capital gains, imposing a higher burden on the assessee. Since the assessee had fulfilled all statutory requirements and the first appellate authority was obligated to consider alternative grounds, the Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to allow the section 54 exemption after appropriate calculations.
The Appellate Tribunal allowed the assessee's claim for tax exemption under section 54 of the Income Tax Act, despite initially claiming under section 54F. The dispute concerned a property registered as residential but commercially leased to a bank since 2009. ITAT noted that both sections have similar conditions, with section 54F requiring investment of net consideration rather than just capital gains, imposing a higher burden on the assessee. Since the assessee had fulfilled all statutory requirements and the first appellate authority was obligated to consider alternative grounds, the Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to allow the section 54 exemption after appropriate calculations.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.