Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
221 to 240 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC refrained from ruling on the constitutionality of Section 168A of the CGST Act and related notifications extending compliance timelines under Section 73(10) during COVID-19. The court noted that the Supreme Court had issued notice in SLP-4240-2025 (HCC-SEW-MEIL-AAG JV v. Assistant Commissioner of State Tax) on similar issues. The HC directed that all connected cases would be governed by the Supreme Court's eventual judgment. The interim orders previously granted would continue to operate until final adjudication by the SC. The SLP was disposed of accordingly, with the court deferring to the apex court's pending determination on the validity of the pandemic-related tax compliance extensions.
HC refrained from ruling on the constitutionality of Section 168A of the CGST Act and related notifications extending compliance timelines under Section 73(10) during COVID-19. The court noted that the Supreme Court had issued notice in SLP-4240-2025 (HCC-SEW-MEIL-AAG JV v. Assistant Commissioner of State Tax) on similar issues. The HC directed that all connected cases would be governed by the Supreme Court's eventual judgment. The interim orders previously granted would continue to operate until final adjudication by the SC. The SLP was disposed of accordingly, with the court deferring to the apex court's pending determination on the validity of the pandemic-related tax compliance extensions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
