Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
The ITAT upheld the denial of deduction under section 54F for LTCG. While the assessee had purchased the plot and obtained construction approvals before selling the original asset, the tribunal found this insufficient to qualify for the deduction. Per section 54F requirements, the assessee needed to either purchase a house within the period from 19.01.2006 to 18.01.2009 or construct one between 19.01.2007 and 18.01.2010. The valuation report indicated construction completion between 2005-06 and 2007-08, establishing that the assessee neither purchased a house within one year nor constructed one within the prescribed statutory period. The order denying the section 54F deduction was consequently confirmed.
The ITAT upheld the denial of deduction under section 54F for LTCG. While the assessee had purchased the plot and obtained construction approvals before selling the original asset, the tribunal found this insufficient to qualify for the deduction. Per section 54F requirements, the assessee needed to either purchase a house within the period from 19.01.2006 to 18.01.2009 or construct one between 19.01.2007 and 18.01.2010. The valuation report indicated construction completion between 2005-06 and 2007-08, establishing that the assessee neither purchased a house within one year nor constructed one within the prescribed statutory period. The order denying the section 54F deduction was consequently confirmed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.