Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The HC dismissed the writ petition challenging the bank's application under Section 14 of SARFAESI Act for taking possession of secured assets. The court found that while the bank's application lacked a formal affidavit (a curable procedural defect), it contained verified transaction history and detailed asset descriptions. The petitioners had not denied receiving the Section 13(2) notice, nor had they responded to or challenged it before competent authorities. Following R.D. Jain and Company (2022), the court affirmed that the DM/CMM's role under Section 14 is ministerial, requiring verification of application information but not adjudication. The court concluded the petitioners were attempting to delay proceedings by concealing notice service facts.
The HC dismissed the writ petition challenging the bank's application under Section 14 of SARFAESI Act for taking possession of secured assets. The court found that while the bank's application lacked a formal affidavit (a curable procedural defect), it contained verified transaction history and detailed asset descriptions. The petitioners had not denied receiving the Section 13(2) notice, nor had they responded to or challenged it before competent authorities. Following R.D. Jain and Company (2022), the court affirmed that the DM/CMM's role under Section 14 is ministerial, requiring verification of application information but not adjudication. The court concluded the petitioners were attempting to delay proceedings by concealing notice service facts.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
