Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Governmental authority status supports construction-service exemption, while pre-cutoff contract and stamp-duty compliance requires verification on re...
Automated Free Sale and Commerce Certificates enable paperless processing while retaining risk-based manual verification for selected exporter applica...
Page of 4830
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96587 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC allowed the appeal against dismissal of a recovery suit under Order VII Rule 11 CPC. The Trial Court incorrectly interpreted the Magistrate's judgment, which had clearly concluded that the appellant successfully rebutted the presumption of the cheque being issued for a legally enforceable debt. The Trial Court improperly rendered findings contrary to the pleadings by accepting the respondent's defense at the preliminary stage, exceeding the permissible scope of examination under Order VII Rule 11. Additionally, the Trial Court's determination that the suit was time-barred failed to consider whether the cause of action was established prior to the Magistrate's judgment dated 19.08.2017, necessitating reconsideration of the limitation issue.
The HC allowed the appeal against dismissal of a recovery suit under Order VII Rule 11 CPC. The Trial Court incorrectly interpreted the Magistrate's judgment, which had clearly concluded that the appellant successfully rebutted the presumption of the cheque being issued for a legally enforceable debt. The Trial Court improperly rendered findings contrary to the pleadings by accepting the respondent's defense at the preliminary stage, exceeding the permissible scope of examination under Order VII Rule 11. Additionally, the Trial Court's determination that the suit was time-barred failed to consider whether the cause of action was established prior to the Magistrate's judgment dated 19.08.2017, necessitating reconsideration of the limitation issue.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4830 
Join Channel 
