Penny-stock additions require transaction-specific evidence; general investigation material alone cannot establish undisclosed income or accommodation...
Transfer pricing comparability prioritises reliable external CUPs and foreign-currency LIBOR benchmarks for exports, borrowings and delayed receivable...
Section 153C satisfaction and seized electronic records sustained unexplained-investment addition, subject to proportionate ownership-share verificati...
The ITAT held that TDS liability under sections 201(1) and 201(1A) regarding lease rent payments made to NOIDA was not applicable to the assessee for A.Y. 2012-13. Following precedents established in Rajesh Projects (India) Pvt. Ltd. and Mahagun (India) (P.) Ltd., the Tribunal determined that the Revenue had no cause of action under these sections for the assessment year in question. The CIT(A)'s decision to delete the TDS liability was confirmed, with the final ruling being against the Revenue.
The ITAT held that TDS liability under sections 201(1) and 201(1A) regarding lease rent payments made to NOIDA was not applicable to the assessee for A.Y. 2012-13. Following precedents established in Rajesh Projects (India) Pvt. Ltd. and Mahagun (India) (P.) Ltd., the Tribunal determined that the Revenue had no cause of action under these sections for the assessment year in question. The CIT(A)'s decision to delete the TDS liability was confirmed, with the final ruling being against the Revenue.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
