Service of notice and contractual debt acknowledgment preserved insolvency admission against a corporate guarantor despite limitation and natural just...
Original works exemption excludes standalone boulder transportation, leaving subcontracted railway-project transport services subject to service tax l...
Annual production capacity determinations excluding stenter galleries support refunds for unconstitutional excise levies without an unjust-enrichment ...
Vicarious liability for cheque dishonour requires specific allegations of responsibility and cheque signatory; generic director allegations cannot sus...
IT Resilience Index requires market infrastructure institutions to automate resilience scoring, early warnings, and continuous service-delivery monito...
ITAT dismissed the Revenue's appeal concerning reopening of assessments under s.147 and additions under s.68 for alleged bogus share application money and unsecured loans. The Tribunal found that the AO mechanically issued s.148 notice based on information from the Investigation Wing without proper application of mind, despite all information being available in the previously completed s.143(3) assessment. Regarding share capital, the assessee had discharged its onus under s.68 by providing documentation establishing identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of transactions. For unsecured loans, the Tribunal noted their repayment within a short period, and that the Revenue's case relied on a retracted statement of Mukesh Banka, which could not form the basis for additions per jurisdictional precedent.
ITAT dismissed the Revenue's appeal concerning reopening of assessments under s.147 and additions under s.68 for alleged bogus share application money and unsecured loans. The Tribunal found that the AO mechanically issued s.148 notice based on information from the Investigation Wing without proper application of mind, despite all information being available in the previously completed s.143(3) assessment. Regarding share capital, the assessee had discharged its onus under s.68 by providing documentation establishing identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of transactions. For unsecured loans, the Tribunal noted their repayment within a short period, and that the Revenue's case relied on a retracted statement of Mukesh Banka, which could not form the basis for additions per jurisdictional precedent.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.