Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
The SC determined that imported goods could not be classified as High Speed Diesel (HSD) based on inconclusive laboratory tests. The Court found that only 8 of 21 required parameters under IS1460:2005 were tested, and even these results were ambiguous, merely indicating the sample had "characteristics of HSD" rather than confirming it was HSD. The Court rejected the High Court's "preponderance of probability" standard, holding that classification under the Customs Tariff Act requires application of the "most akin" test with conclusive scientific evidence. Since the burden of proof rests with Customs authorities and the evidence was insufficient, the Court disposed of the appeal in favor of the appellants who claimed the goods were Base Oil.
The SC determined that imported goods could not be classified as High Speed Diesel (HSD) based on inconclusive laboratory tests. The Court found that only 8 of 21 required parameters under IS1460:2005 were tested, and even these results were ambiguous, merely indicating the sample had "characteristics of HSD" rather than confirming it was HSD. The Court rejected the High Court's "preponderance of probability" standard, holding that classification under the Customs Tariff Act requires application of the "most akin" test with conclusive scientific evidence. Since the burden of proof rests with Customs authorities and the evidence was insufficient, the Court disposed of the appeal in favor of the appellants who claimed the goods were Base Oil.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.