Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The HC denied leave to appeal against Sumit's acquittal while granting it against Anubhav in a dishonored cheque case. Regarding Sumit (Vice President of Finance), the court held that mere awareness of transactions was insufficient to establish vicarious liability under s.141 NI Act. The complainant failed to discharge the initial evidentiary burden to prove Sumit was "in charge of and responsible to the company." For Anubhav, the court found the appellate judge had improperly emphasized absent documents rather than evaluating available evidence holistically. The HC clarified that when reviewing acquittals, courts should proceed cautiously as the presumption of innocence is reinforced, applying different standards of inquiry at leave stage versus final appeal determination.
The HC denied leave to appeal against Sumit's acquittal while granting it against Anubhav in a dishonored cheque case. Regarding Sumit (Vice President of Finance), the court held that mere awareness of transactions was insufficient to establish vicarious liability under s.141 NI Act. The complainant failed to discharge the initial evidentiary burden to prove Sumit was "in charge of and responsible to the company." For Anubhav, the court found the appellate judge had improperly emphasized absent documents rather than evaluating available evidence holistically. The HC clarified that when reviewing acquittals, courts should proceed cautiously as the presumption of innocence is reinforced, applying different standards of inquiry at leave stage versus final appeal determination.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
