Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The HC partially allowed the appeal against the cancellation of property sale through e-auction initiated by SEBI. While upholding the cancellation due to non-payment of balance consideration within the specified time, the HC set aside the automatic forfeiture of the entire Earnest Money Deposit (EMD). The court found that Rule 58 of the Second Schedule of Income Tax Act and Order XXI Rule 86 of CPC confer discretionary power on authorities regarding EMD forfeiture, requiring consideration of actual damages suffered. The HC directed SEBI to reconsider the extent of EMD forfeiture after providing the appellant an opportunity of hearing and to determine the appropriate forfeiture amount within 8 weeks.
The HC partially allowed the appeal against the cancellation of property sale through e-auction initiated by SEBI. While upholding the cancellation due to non-payment of balance consideration within the specified time, the HC set aside the automatic forfeiture of the entire Earnest Money Deposit (EMD). The court found that Rule 58 of the Second Schedule of Income Tax Act and Order XXI Rule 86 of CPC confer discretionary power on authorities regarding EMD forfeiture, requiring consideration of actual damages suffered. The HC directed SEBI to reconsider the extent of EMD forfeiture after providing the appellant an opportunity of hearing and to determine the appropriate forfeiture amount within 8 weeks.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
