Employee stock-shortage penalties do not constitute consideration for services, preventing GST collection under Schedule II in employment relationship...
Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
Page of 4830
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
181 to 200 of 96587 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC declined to entertain a petition challenging an AI-generated order that declared the petitioner's tax return invalid for non-filing of an audit report under Section 44AB. The court criticized the impugned order as a "nonspeaking order" that violated principles of natural justice by failing to provide minimal reasoning for rejecting the petitioner's claim that its gross receipts (Rs. 6.15 crores) were below the threshold requiring audit (Rs. 10 crores). While acknowledging the efficiency of automated systems, the HC emphasized that AI cannot supersede fundamental principles of natural justice. Nevertheless, the court directed the petitioner to pursue the alternate statutory remedy of revision under Section 264 of the Income Tax Act rather than exercising extraordinary jurisdiction.
The HC declined to entertain a petition challenging an AI-generated order that declared the petitioner's tax return invalid for non-filing of an audit report under Section 44AB. The court criticized the impugned order as a "nonspeaking order" that violated principles of natural justice by failing to provide minimal reasoning for rejecting the petitioner's claim that its gross receipts (Rs. 6.15 crores) were below the threshold requiring audit (Rs. 10 crores). While acknowledging the efficiency of automated systems, the HC emphasized that AI cannot supersede fundamental principles of natural justice. Nevertheless, the court directed the petitioner to pursue the alternate statutory remedy of revision under Section 264 of the Income Tax Act rather than exercising extraordinary jurisdiction.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4830 
Join Channel 
