Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT dismissed grounds 1 and 2 regarding validity of assessment order, relying on Aztec Software precedent. The Tribunal allowed ground 3 concerning Intra Group Services, following a coordinate Bench decision in assessee's own case for AY 2010-11, as Revenue failed to demonstrate distinguishing features in the current assessment year. Similarly, ground 4 regarding disallowance of mark-up charged by AEs on fixed asset purchases was allowed, directing deletion of the ALP adjustment. Regarding royalty payments, ITAT rejected Revenue's appeal, citing EKL Appliances which negated the need-benefit test, and Magneti Marelli Powertrain which established that TPO cannot segregate transactions already aggregated and benchmarked under TNMM to reduce their ALP to nil under CUP method.
ITAT dismissed grounds 1 and 2 regarding validity of assessment order, relying on Aztec Software precedent. The Tribunal allowed ground 3 concerning Intra Group Services, following a coordinate Bench decision in assessee's own case for AY 2010-11, as Revenue failed to demonstrate distinguishing features in the current assessment year. Similarly, ground 4 regarding disallowance of mark-up charged by AEs on fixed asset purchases was allowed, directing deletion of the ALP adjustment. Regarding royalty payments, ITAT rejected Revenue's appeal, citing EKL Appliances which negated the need-benefit test, and Magneti Marelli Powertrain which established that TPO cannot segregate transactions already aggregated and benchmarked under TNMM to reduce their ALP to nil under CUP method.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
