Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The SC held that upon approval of a resolution plan under Section 31 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, all dues not included in the plan are extinguished, including statutory dues owed to government authorities. The Court determined that authorities' attempts to recover pre-resolution plan dues were contemptuous, as these claims were not submitted during the resolution process despite public notice. While finding the respondents' actions contemptuous for continuing recovery proceedings after the Ghanshyam Mishra judgment was brought to their attention, the Court declined to impose penalties, giving them the benefit of doubt. The demand notices and subsequent proceedings were quashed as illegal, and the contempt petition was disposed of after accepting the contemnors' unconditional apology.
The SC held that upon approval of a resolution plan under Section 31 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, all dues not included in the plan are extinguished, including statutory dues owed to government authorities. The Court determined that authorities' attempts to recover pre-resolution plan dues were contemptuous, as these claims were not submitted during the resolution process despite public notice. While finding the respondents' actions contemptuous for continuing recovery proceedings after the Ghanshyam Mishra judgment was brought to their attention, the Court declined to impose penalties, giving them the benefit of doubt. The demand notices and subsequent proceedings were quashed as illegal, and the contempt petition was disposed of after accepting the contemnors' unconditional apology.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
