Service of notice and contractual debt acknowledgment preserved insolvency admission against a corporate guarantor despite limitation and natural just...
Original works exemption excludes standalone boulder transportation, leaving subcontracted railway-project transport services subject to service tax l...
Annual production capacity determinations excluding stenter galleries support refunds for unconstitutional excise levies without an unjust-enrichment ...
Vicarious liability for cheque dishonour requires specific allegations of responsibility and cheque signatory; generic director allegations cannot sus...
IT Resilience Index requires market infrastructure institutions to automate resilience scoring, early warnings, and continuous service-delivery monito...
ITAT upheld the disallowance of LTCG exemption claimed under section 10(38), determining the transactions constituted a predetermined scheme to introduce unaccounted income. The Tribunal found the assessee's 400% profit in 13 months from penny stock NCL Research was not genuine, noting the suspicious pattern of dormant scrip suddenly appreciating despite poor financial parameters. The synchronized buying and selling, coupled with investigations by Income Tax authorities and SEBI, established the transactions as sham arrangements. The Tribunal emphasized that documentation like contract notes and banking channel evidence alone cannot establish genuineness when market forces don't justify the price increase. The CIT(A)'s findings regarding price manipulation were affirmed.
ITAT upheld the disallowance of LTCG exemption claimed under section 10(38), determining the transactions constituted a predetermined scheme to introduce unaccounted income. The Tribunal found the assessee's 400% profit in 13 months from penny stock NCL Research was not genuine, noting the suspicious pattern of dormant scrip suddenly appreciating despite poor financial parameters. The synchronized buying and selling, coupled with investigations by Income Tax authorities and SEBI, established the transactions as sham arrangements. The Tribunal emphasized that documentation like contract notes and banking channel evidence alone cannot establish genuineness when market forces don't justify the price increase. The CIT(A)'s findings regarding price manipulation were affirmed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
