Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
The HC dismissed the petition challenging proceedings under SARFAESI Act, upholding the principle that writ jurisdiction should not be invoked when statutory remedies remain available. The Court determined that despite the requirement to deposit funds to file an appeal under Section 18 of SARFAESI Act, this condition alone does not justify bypassing the statutory framework. Following PHR Invent Educational Society v. UCO Bank (2024), the HC affirmed that the SARFAESI Act constitutes a complete code with comprehensive remedies at various stages of proceedings. The Court concluded that Article 226 jurisdiction should be exercised sparingly when efficacious alternative remedies exist within the statutory scheme.
The HC dismissed the petition challenging proceedings under SARFAESI Act, upholding the principle that writ jurisdiction should not be invoked when statutory remedies remain available. The Court determined that despite the requirement to deposit funds to file an appeal under Section 18 of SARFAESI Act, this condition alone does not justify bypassing the statutory framework. Following PHR Invent Educational Society v. UCO Bank (2024), the HC affirmed that the SARFAESI Act constitutes a complete code with comprehensive remedies at various stages of proceedings. The Court concluded that Article 226 jurisdiction should be exercised sparingly when efficacious alternative remedies exist within the statutory scheme.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
