Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
The AAAR determined that the appeal was not maintainable as the AAR had failed to address three questions in its original ruling. Since the questions regarding GST on developed plot sales, development services to landowners, transfer of development rights, valuation of services, and timing of tax payments were interlinked, the AAAR could not effectively decide on the partial ruling. Despite Section 101 of CGST Act, 2017 lacking explicit remand provisions, the AAAR set aside the lower authority's order and remanded the matter to the AAR for fresh consideration to ensure complete adjudication of all interrelated questions.
The AAAR determined that the appeal was not maintainable as the AAR had failed to address three questions in its original ruling. Since the questions regarding GST on developed plot sales, development services to landowners, transfer of development rights, valuation of services, and timing of tax payments were interlinked, the AAAR could not effectively decide on the partial ruling. Despite Section 101 of CGST Act, 2017 lacking explicit remand provisions, the AAAR set aside the lower authority's order and remanded the matter to the AAR for fresh consideration to ensure complete adjudication of all interrelated questions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
