Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The ITAT remanded three issues to the AO/TPO for reconsideration. Regarding transfer pricing, the Tribunal held that the TPO misunderstood the assessee's business structure and incorrectly rejected the Resale Price Method (RPM) despite its prior acceptance by Revenue for the trading segment. The AO/TPO must redo the ALP adjustment using RPM, recognizing the assessee's dual manufacturing and trading segments. On the Section 37 disallowance of 10% of total expenditure, the AO must verify additional evidence submitted by the assessee. Concerning the Section 69C addition based solely on CBEC export-import data, the ITAT directed the AO to collect comprehensive information from the assessee regarding imports and reconcile with customs duty paid, rather than relying exclusively on CBEC data.
The ITAT remanded three issues to the AO/TPO for reconsideration. Regarding transfer pricing, the Tribunal held that the TPO misunderstood the assessee's business structure and incorrectly rejected the Resale Price Method (RPM) despite its prior acceptance by Revenue for the trading segment. The AO/TPO must redo the ALP adjustment using RPM, recognizing the assessee's dual manufacturing and trading segments. On the Section 37 disallowance of 10% of total expenditure, the AO must verify additional evidence submitted by the assessee. Concerning the Section 69C addition based solely on CBEC export-import data, the ITAT directed the AO to collect comprehensive information from the assessee regarding imports and reconcile with customs duty paid, rather than relying exclusively on CBEC data.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
