Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
The HC dismissed a writ application challenging seizure of goods and vehicle due to fatal procedural defects in the supporting affidavit. The deponent, Gopal Yadav, failed to establish proper authorization to represent all petitioners, claiming only to be the manager-cum-authorized representative of petitioner no.3. The affidavit lacked mandatory declarations that the deponent had reviewed the statements in the application or had them explained to him. These deficiencies rendered the affidavit legally insufficient under Patna HC rules. Finding the writ application incompetent due to improper representation, the court dismissed it as withdrawn.
The HC dismissed a writ application challenging seizure of goods and vehicle due to fatal procedural defects in the supporting affidavit. The deponent, Gopal Yadav, failed to establish proper authorization to represent all petitioners, claiming only to be the manager-cum-authorized representative of petitioner no.3. The affidavit lacked mandatory declarations that the deponent had reviewed the statements in the application or had them explained to him. These deficiencies rendered the affidavit legally insufficient under Patna HC rules. Finding the writ application incompetent due to improper representation, the court dismissed it as withdrawn.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
