Purposive interpretation of residential house exemption: unregistered purchase agreement alone does not defeat relief, but investment must be verified...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3041 to 3060 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The AAAR dismissed the appeal regarding eligibility to claim ITC on GST paid for employee transportation services. The authority ruled that under Section 17(5) of CGST Act, ITC is available only when provision of such services is statutorily obligatory for employers. Since the appellant provided transportation merely as a convenience measure for employees at a remote factory location without any statutory obligation, ITC was disallowed. Additionally, per CBIC Circular No. 172/04/2022-GST, transportation services provided as contractual perquisites fall under Schedule III and are non-taxable. Consequently, ITC on inward services used for providing such non-taxable services cannot be availed.
The AAAR dismissed the appeal regarding eligibility to claim ITC on GST paid for employee transportation services. The authority ruled that under Section 17(5) of CGST Act, ITC is available only when provision of such services is statutorily obligatory for employers. Since the appellant provided transportation merely as a convenience measure for employees at a remote factory location without any statutory obligation, ITC was disallowed. Additionally, per CBIC Circular No. 172/04/2022-GST, transportation services provided as contractual perquisites fall under Schedule III and are non-taxable. Consequently, ITC on inward services used for providing such non-taxable services cannot be availed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
