Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Page of 4798
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
341 to 360 of 95957 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The AAAR determined that Aluminium Composite Panels/Sheets are properly classified under HSN 7606, not under HSN 3920 or HSN 7610. Applying Rule 3(b) of the General Rules for Interpretation of Tariff, the Central Member concluded that the goods fall under Chapter 76 since aluminum gives the essential character to the ACPs. The contending Heading 7610 was ruled out as the subject goods are not aluminum structures or parts of structures. Following CESTAT precedent in Commissioner of Customs (Imports) Chennai Vs ICP India Pvt. Ltd., the panels were determined to be classifiable under Heading 7606 with an applicable GST rate of 18%.
The AAAR determined that Aluminium Composite Panels/Sheets are properly classified under HSN 7606, not under HSN 3920 or HSN 7610. Applying Rule 3(b) of the General Rules for Interpretation of Tariff, the Central Member concluded that the goods fall under Chapter 76 since aluminum gives the essential character to the ACPs. The contending Heading 7610 was ruled out as the subject goods are not aluminum structures or parts of structures. Following CESTAT precedent in Commissioner of Customs (Imports) Chennai Vs ICP India Pvt. Ltd., the panels were determined to be classifiable under Heading 7606 with an applicable GST rate of 18%.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
