Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The ITAT ruled that GST collected as a separate line item in invoices, being a statutory levy, should not be included in gross receipts when computing presumptive income under Section 44BB of the Act. Following precedents in Orient Overseas Container Line Limited and Seadrill International Ltd, the Tribunal held that GST stands outside the computation of gross receipts for Section 44BB purposes. The Assessing Officer was directed to exclude GST amounts while determining the assessee's gross receipts for presumptive income calculation. The assessee's ground of appeal on this issue was allowed, establishing that statutory levies separately identified in invoices are not part of the computational base for presumptive taxation.
The ITAT ruled that GST collected as a separate line item in invoices, being a statutory levy, should not be included in gross receipts when computing presumptive income under Section 44BB of the Act. Following precedents in Orient Overseas Container Line Limited and Seadrill International Ltd, the Tribunal held that GST stands outside the computation of gross receipts for Section 44BB purposes. The Assessing Officer was directed to exclude GST amounts while determining the assessee's gross receipts for presumptive income calculation. The assessee's ground of appeal on this issue was allowed, establishing that statutory levies separately identified in invoices are not part of the computational base for presumptive taxation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.