Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The AT upheld penalties against a Research Analyst for multiple regulatory violations. The appellant failed to sign and date research reports, maintain proper records of recommendations made on WhatsApp/Telegram channels, and establish independence between research activities and other business ventures. The tribunal rejected arguments that WhatsApp/Telegram publications did not constitute "public appearances" requiring disclosure. The AT found the appellant violated arm's length requirements by operating multiple business divisions (Chartered Accountancy, Spiritual Teaching, and News Broadcasting) while functioning as a Research Analyst. Penalties under Sections 15A(c), 15EB, and 15HA totaling 15 lakhs were confirmed for misleading information and multiple regulatory breaches.
The AT upheld penalties against a Research Analyst for multiple regulatory violations. The appellant failed to sign and date research reports, maintain proper records of recommendations made on WhatsApp/Telegram channels, and establish independence between research activities and other business ventures. The tribunal rejected arguments that WhatsApp/Telegram publications did not constitute "public appearances" requiring disclosure. The AT found the appellant violated arm's length requirements by operating multiple business divisions (Chartered Accountancy, Spiritual Teaching, and News Broadcasting) while functioning as a Research Analyst. Penalties under Sections 15A(c), 15EB, and 15HA totaling 15 lakhs were confirmed for misleading information and multiple regulatory breaches.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.