Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The HC granted regular bail to an 86-year-old petitioner in a PMLA case, finding him "infirm" under the proviso to Section 45(1). While not deemed "sick" as per the AIIMS medical board's opinion that his ailments could be treated in jail, the Court determined his cognitive impairment, pseudodementia, recurrent dizziness, history of falls, and need for constant monitoring qualified him as "infirm." This exempted him from meeting the twin test requirements of Section 45(1). The Court also noted he satisfied the triple test for bail (no flight risk, witness influence, or evidence tampering) and considered the inevitable trial delay given the case's complexity (17 accused, 66 companies, 121 witnesses, and over 77,000 pages of documents). Bail was granted subject to conditions.
The HC granted regular bail to an 86-year-old petitioner in a PMLA case, finding him "infirm" under the proviso to Section 45(1). While not deemed "sick" as per the AIIMS medical board's opinion that his ailments could be treated in jail, the Court determined his cognitive impairment, pseudodementia, recurrent dizziness, history of falls, and need for constant monitoring qualified him as "infirm." This exempted him from meeting the twin test requirements of Section 45(1). The Court also noted he satisfied the triple test for bail (no flight risk, witness influence, or evidence tampering) and considered the inevitable trial delay given the case's complexity (17 accused, 66 companies, 121 witnesses, and over 77,000 pages of documents). Bail was granted subject to conditions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
