Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Page of 4796
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
301 to 320 of 95918 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC disposed of the petition regarding cancellation of the petitioner's GST registration due to non-filing of statutory returns for six continuous months. Following precedent established in Tvl.Suguna Cutpiece Center's case, the court permitted the petitioner to restore their registration by filing outstanding returns within 45 days, along with payment of defaulted tax, applicable interest, late fees, and fines. The petitioner had expressed willingness to fulfill these obligations as required under the GST Act. The court consistently applies this remedy in similar cases, allowing taxpayers an opportunity to rectify compliance failures rather than maintaining registration cancellations.
The HC disposed of the petition regarding cancellation of the petitioner's GST registration due to non-filing of statutory returns for six continuous months. Following precedent established in Tvl.Suguna Cutpiece Center's case, the court permitted the petitioner to restore their registration by filing outstanding returns within 45 days, along with payment of defaulted tax, applicable interest, late fees, and fines. The petitioner had expressed willingness to fulfill these obligations as required under the GST Act. The court consistently applies this remedy in similar cases, allowing taxpayers an opportunity to rectify compliance failures rather than maintaining registration cancellations.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4796
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
