Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The ITAT ruled that expenses related to an aborted Initial Public Offering (IPO) are deductible under s.37 of the Income Tax Act, following the precedent set in Nimbus Communication Ltd. While share issue expenses are generally capital in nature and non-deductible under s.37 (except as permitted under s.35D), the Tribunal distinguished between completed and abandoned capital projects. The ITAT held that aborted share issue expenses qualify for business deduction, setting aside the CIT(A)'s finding and directing the Assessing Officer to delete the addition to the extent related to the assessee's equity base increase, excluding expenses pertaining to the Offer For Sale (OFS) by promoters. The assessee's appeal was allowed.
The ITAT ruled that expenses related to an aborted Initial Public Offering (IPO) are deductible under s.37 of the Income Tax Act, following the precedent set in Nimbus Communication Ltd. While share issue expenses are generally capital in nature and non-deductible under s.37 (except as permitted under s.35D), the Tribunal distinguished between completed and abandoned capital projects. The ITAT held that aborted share issue expenses qualify for business deduction, setting aside the CIT(A)'s finding and directing the Assessing Officer to delete the addition to the extent related to the assessee's equity base increase, excluding expenses pertaining to the Offer For Sale (OFS) by promoters. The assessee's appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
