Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
HC ordered the release of personal jewelry (318g and 597g) seized from Petitioners at IGI Airport upon their return from the USA. The court determined the items were personal effects of Indian citizens returning after attending a family event abroad. Despite the detention occurring in July 2024, no show cause notice had been issued by customs authorities. The court found no justification for continued detention and directed release of the jewelry within four weeks to Petitioners or their authorized representative, subject to verification, with no storage charges to be collected by Customs. Petition disposed of.
HC ordered the release of personal jewelry (318g and 597g) seized from Petitioners at IGI Airport upon their return from the USA. The court determined the items were personal effects of Indian citizens returning after attending a family event abroad. Despite the detention occurring in July 2024, no show cause notice had been issued by customs authorities. The court found no justification for continued detention and directed release of the jewelry within four weeks to Petitioners or their authorized representative, subject to verification, with no storage charges to be collected by Customs. Petition disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.