Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The HC set aside the order rejecting the petitioner's application under s.119(2)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for condonation of delay in filing returns. The Court held that authorities should adopt a liberal approach when considering pandemic-related hardships. The petitioner, a private limited company, had cited relocation to their native place during the pandemic and medical issues as reasons for delay. The Court emphasized that delay may be condoned where genuine hardship would result from refusal. The matter was remanded to the second respondent for fresh consideration, with the petitioner permitted to submit supporting documentation.
The HC set aside the order rejecting the petitioner's application under s.119(2)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for condonation of delay in filing returns. The Court held that authorities should adopt a liberal approach when considering pandemic-related hardships. The petitioner, a private limited company, had cited relocation to their native place during the pandemic and medical issues as reasons for delay. The Court emphasized that delay may be condoned where genuine hardship would result from refusal. The matter was remanded to the second respondent for fresh consideration, with the petitioner permitted to submit supporting documentation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.